Filed under: 2° AV Block
Sorry for not posting much lately, folks! I guess I’ve just been too busy…! Anyway, hope you like this one. It was brought to me by a colleague who thought I might enjoy it. He was perfectly right about that!
The patient: Elderly male, admitted to the CCU for near syncopes and episodic dizziness. He had a known atrial flutter, and was using betablockers and flecainide. I’m afraid I do not have the full list here, nor the dosages. He was sleeping when this episode occured and didn’t notice anything. He also did not pass out.
EKG description: This is atrial flutter (type 1, counter-clockwise) at approx. 260 bpm, with a high and quite varied degree of atrioventricular block. The lowest F-wave/QRS ratio in the top strip, is 4:1, resulting in a ventricular rate of around 65 bpm. Medications might play a part here, but one would suspect the ratio to be lower at this atrial rate. The long blocked period shows ventricular standstill that lasts for almost 6 seconds. This is of course the reason for his episodic dizziness and near syncopes (I’m surprised he didn’t syncope completely). In the lower strip, the blocked periods get even longer, practically resulting in ventricular standstill. With such persisting absence of AV conduction, normally one would expect a ventricular ectopic focus to take over. This however, did not happen here.
Conclusively, this is atrial flutter with a high-degree atrioventricular block and intermittent episodes ventricular standstill. The patophysiology behind this could be AV-node tissue degeneration over time, leading to progressively increasing level of block.
December 16, 2009
Click image for larger version (will open in new window)
Patient/anamnesis: n/a
ECG interpretation/discussion: This ECG is a printout from a telemetry station, derived from a 5 lead patient monitoring. So, what have we here? The underlying rhythm is sinoatrial, but both PR and RR interval varies. Remember, Wenckebach is not the name of a certain type of block, but rather a type of conduction. This is often misunderstood, as Second Degree AV Block Type 1 or Mobitz 1 is also often labelled Wenckebach block. A more precise term would be Wenckebach periodity, phenomenon, conduction. Wenckebach conduction is usually considered benign and can be recognized by the following criteria:
1) PR interval is progressively prolonged until a P wave is blocked
2) The shortest PR interval is the one immediately following the dropped beat. The longest PR interval is the one immediately before the dropped beat. The incremental change in PR interval is in the beginning of the Wenckebach cycle, thus between the first and second PR interval in a sequence.
3) The RR intervals progressively shorten until a QRS is ‘dropped’ due to the non-conducted atrial/sinoatrial impulse.
Now, looking at this ECG, the two first beats are at the end of a Wenckebach cycle. After the second QRS a non-conducted P wave occurs. The following beat is wide and bizarre and is a ventricular escape beat that occurs due to the long preceding pause. After the escape beat, a new Wenckebach cycle starts. The PR interval lengthens until a P wave is blocked. After this pause, a narrow QRS is preceded by a P wave with a very, very short PR interval. This is a junctional escape beat. Then, the Wenckebach cycle restarts.
When counting P waves and QRS complexes in the cycles, we’ll see that for every three QRS complexes there are four P waves, since one of the QRS complexes gets dropped repeatedly. This gives a 4:3 atrioventricular (AV) ratio, which is also called 4:3 conduction.
What a beauty! Thanks to my colleague and fellow ECG-dork for bringing me this rare gem!
September 6, 2009
The patient is an 80 y/o woman with known sick sinus syndrome, aortic sclerosis, aortic valve insufficiency, mitral valve insufficiency, tricuspidal valve insufficiency and left ventricular hypertrophy.
About the sick sinus syndrome and the tachy-brady syndrome
There are two types of Sick Sinus Syndrome (SSS): one with and one without associated tachyarrhythmias. SSS is due to many mechanisms related to SA-nodal failure, and in many patients with the syndrome more than one of the mechanisms are present. The most common mechanisms for SSS are severe, persistent sinus bradycardia, sinus arrest, both brief and sustained, with or without initiation of escape pacemakers, sometimes resulting in sustained asystole. Both Stokes-Adams attacks and sudden death is seen with SSS. When SSS is associated with tachyarrhytmhias, this is called the tachy-brady syndrome. Tachy-brady syndrome occurs in more than half of the patients with SSS.¹ The tachy-brady syndrome itself is not a specific condition, but more of a mixture of combinations of arrhythmias. I find it confusing that even the most profilic authors on this subject, as both Marriott² and Chou¹, tend to disagree on whether SSS should be considered part of the tachy-brady syndrome or vice versa. However, there seems to be consistency upon the fact that SSS can occur in two forms, with our without the associated tachycardias. Furthermore the tachy-brady syndrome is usually described as the condition where a tachycardia mechanism is directly associated with the mechanism of a bradycardia or the other way around. One author³ also differentiates between a tachy-brady syndrome and a brady-tachy syndrome, depending on what mechanism that initiates the next.
This series of telemetry strips from the patient described above, show the tachy-brady syndrome in action, manifested by a large and complex cascade of arrhythmic events. Note that there is a baseline first degree AV block at approximately 260 ms.
Note that each strip is not an exact continuation of the strip before it, meaning that i.e. strip number 2 can repeat some of the events in strip 1.
Click image for full scale version (will open in a new window)
Top strip: After 4 cycles of sinus bradycardia (43 bpm), atrial flutter occurs. The atrial rate is approximately 260 bpm, and 2:1 AV conduction occurs, resulting in a ventricular rate of 130 bpm. There are F waves (flutter waves) superimposed on each T wave.
Middle strip: Note that this strip is not an exact continuation of strip 1. The first 12 beats are the same. It shows however the atrial flutter persisting with the same AV ratio for several seconds.
Bottom strip: After a while, 4:1 conduction occurs for one cycle. The next cycle is interrupted by a PVC triplet, or a short run of ventricular tachycardia (VT). After the ventricular triplet, the AV node alternates with 2:1 and 3:1 conduction.
Click image for full scale version (will open in a new window)
Top strip: Atrial flutter still persists, while 2:1, 3:1 and 4:1 AV conduction occurs successively, before a four beat salvo of premature ventricular contractions occur. Such a salvo would also be considered non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Following the salvo, AV ratio continues to vary and also with higher degrees of block. 2:1, 3:1 4:1 and 5:1 AV block occurs successively towards the end of the strip.
Middle strip: This strip is almost a repetition of the top strip, and can be ignored.
Bottom strip: Here we can see that even higher degree of AV block occurs, with AV ratio as high as 6:1 before progressively decreasing again.
Click image for full scale version (will open in a new window)
Top strip: This strip is recorded at 50mm/s, and shows the baseline atrial flutter being conducted with high degrees of AV block, and interrupted by a 5-beat run of ventricular tachycardia at 140 bpm.
Middle strip: Various degrees of AV block are seen throughout the strip. The deep, negative deflection towards the end is due to a loose electrode.
Bottom strip: AV block continues to vary, here mostly between a 2:1 and 3:1 ratio.
¹ Surawicz, Borys, Chou’s electrocardiography in clinical practice. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2006:336-343, 6th edition.
² Wagner, Galen S., Marriott’s Practical Electrocardiography. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 396-404, 10th edition
³ Sandøe, Erik and Bjarne Sigurd, Klinisk Elektrokardiografi. Bingen: Publishing Partners Verlag GmbH, 326-331, 1st edition.
June 18, 2009
Click image for full scale version (will open in a new window)
Click image for full scale version (will open in a new window)
Patient: Woman, 82 y/o with permanent atrial fibrillation. Accidental digitalis intoxication. Serum digoxin level when arriving in the ER is 6.6 ng/ml. General fatigue, but no recent history of syncopal episodes.
ECG description:
- Irregular, narrow QRS bradycardia at approx. 35 bpm
- Atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response
- Normal axis at ca. 60 degrees
- Prominent U waves, best seen in leads V2 -V3
- Cohn effect: ST segment depression and flattened T wave in leads V4-V6
- Poor R wave progression
- Low amplitude in limb leads
- Baseline noise artefact
Discussion: This 12 lead ECG displays atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response. There is a high degree of AV block, resulting in a bradycardic rate at ca 35 bpm (50 mm/s). The axis is in the normal quadrant and at ca. 60 degrees. Limb leads show T wave flattening, and there is perhaps a slight ST segment depression visible in leads II and AVF. There is a quite prominent U wave. Normally, the U wave is best appreciated in the lateral precordial leads (V5-V6). Here however, it is seen in leads V2 and V3. The classic ST segment morphology induced by digitalis both at therapeutic and toxic serum levels, is the “coved” or “scooped”, or sometimes referred to as “bowl shaped” ST segment depression. It is sometimes described as if the ST segment has been dragged downwards from a point at the middle of the segment. Digitalis intoxications may however, manifest with or without the classic morphology even at high serum levels. The classic digitalis effect on the ST segment is sometimes called the Cohn Effect, named after Alfred E. Cohn, the American cardiologist, for his early 1900-century studies on the effect of digitalis on T wave morphology. It is generally recognized by ST segment depression together with T wave flattening in the same lead. Although this ECG lacks the coving ST segment, the Cohn effect is present in leads V4-V6.
Overall, digitalis has a positiv inotropic effect and a negative chronotropic effect. The negative chronotropy is due to both decreased automaticity of the SA node as well as prolongation of the refractory period of the AV nodal tissue, thus inducing higher degrees of AV block. It also increases AV nodal automaticity which often results in for instance accelerated junctional rhytm and junctional extrasystolia.
This ECG is in the low bradycardic range at around 35 bpm, which is due to the high serum levels of digoxin. Different AV ratios can occur, but 2:1 is rare. With second degree AV blocks, Wenckebach conduction is common. In this ECG it’s impossible to determine the AV ratio, due to atrial fibrillation, and one can only conclude that it is varying. Following is a continous rhythm strip (25 mm/s) of the patient that was obtained 10 minutes later, showing the development of higher degrees of AV block, resulting in long bradycardic cycles.
Click image for full scale version (will open in a new window)
Note the long, asystolic pauses. The first and third cycles are so long (>2 seconds) that ventricular escape occurs.
June 18, 2009
Click image for full scale version (will open in a new window)
Patient: Woman, 51 y/o. Mitral valve replacement 21 years ago. Known paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Presents in the ER with nausea, pale skin, mild diaphoresis, palpitations and diffuse chest pain.
Prehospital ECG:
- Supraventricular tachycardia
- Ventricular rate is ca. 120 bpm
- Normal axis at ca. 10°
- Atrial activity best visible in lead V1, showing P waves with a slightly varying and prolonged PR interval.
- Several P waves superimposed and partially hidden in T waves
- Pseudo R waves in lead V1
Interpretation: This faxed ECG shows a supraventricular tachycardia, but right precordial lead V1 shows clear atrial activity. The small, peaked P waves with a slightly changing and prolonged PR interval suggests atrial ectopy. Ectopic Atrial Tachycardia rarely occurs with 1:1 ratio, as the AV node usually blocks half or more of the impulses. A common AV block ratio is 2:1. With a ventricular rate of 120 bpm, a 2:1 AV block would indicate an atrial rate of 240 bpm. This would be a typical atrial rate for ectopic atrial tachycardia. Using a ruler or a caliper and measuring from one of the visible P waves here, we will see exactly that: P waves appear at a rate of 240 bpm. The most visible P waves are right after or superimposed on T waves, and the others are hidden in or appearing right after each QRS, creating what looks like a small S wave, a pseudo S wave.
Click image for full scale version (will open in a new window)
To confirm the diagnosis, carotid pressure is applied while a rhythm strip is recorded. Paper speed is set to 50 mm/s in order to discern P waves more easily. When pressure is applied, a larger AV block is induced and 3:1 periods occur intermittently. During these blocks, clearly discernable P waves are seen in the right precordial leads. The P waves show atrial ectopic activity at a rate of 240 bpm, just as we suspected from the previous ECG. By marching out the P waves with a caliper, we’ll see that every other P wave gets completely or partially hidden in the QRS complexes when the ratio changes back to 2:1.
May 17, 2009
Click to see full scale version (will open in a new window)
Click to see full scale version (will open in a new window)
Patient: Woman, 70 y/o. Congestive Heart Failure. Using digitalis.
ECG description:
- Narrow complex tachycardia of supraventricular origin.
- Variable ventricular rate. Rate varies from 73-105 bpm.
- Right Axis Deviation. Cardiac axis is at approx. 150°
- Multiple P’ waves. Atrial rate is 210 bpm.
- Varying AV Block. P:QRS ratio ranging from 1:1 to 3:1.
- Ectopic P’ waves, inverted in inferior leads II, III, aVF. P waves superimposed on QRS complexes.
- Prominent Q waves in inferior leads, II, III aVF.
- T wave inversion in inferior leads, II, III, aVF
ECG comments: This EKG shows an Ectopic Atrial Tachycardia (EAT) with variable degree of AV Conduction, and was in the clinical setting mistaken for atrial flutter when the patient was presented in the ER. A common mistake to make, as atrial flutter is probably the arrhythmia that resembles EAT the most electrocardiographically. Atrial flutter is a common differential diagnosis with EAT, but making the wrong diagnosis here can however, be dangerous for the patient. The pitfall is that paradoxically, atrial flutter is treated with digitalis, which again induces EAT. Which means that if EAT is being mistakenly treated with digitalis, the arrhythmia will be sustained, as well as the degree of AV block could be increased. This will be like adding fuel to a fire. Untreated EAT with block can at some point compromise the patient’s cardiac output and result in hemodynamic unstability. The treatment for EAT is, of course to remove the digitalis intoxication.
Differentiating Ectopic Atrial Tachycardia and Atrial Flutter
The reason that EAT is often mistaken for atrial flutter, is because of the multiple P waves. Depending on their axis and morphology, they can for the untrained eye easily resemble flutter waves (F waves). Also, if one suspects an atypical flutter pattern, one might think that the P waves are due to flutter activity. However, the key is to understand the electrophysiology behind the two mechanisms and how they will appear on a surface EKG. If you understand the underlying electrophysiologic mechanisms of atrial flutter, differentiating it on a surface EKG is much easier. Also, by examining both the P waves and the baseline of the different leads, the correct diagnosis will be easily within reach in most cases.
Atrial Flutter
- Is characterized by a rapid and regular atrial rhythm at rates from 250 to 400 bpm.
- Due to the macroreentry mechanism of atrial flutter, where an ectopic impulse travels counterclockwisely in a circular fashion usually within the right atria, flutter waves are created on the EKG. When the impulse has travelled a full circle, it reactivates the same focus again, creating a reentry loop mechanism. Thus, where one F-wave ends, the next one arises immediately. Several F waves together makes out the hallmark saw tooth baseline.
- Flutter waves (F waves) and the saw tooth pattern are best seen in the inferior leads, II, III and aVF. Sometimes, F waves are more clearly visible in lead V1.
- Seldom coexist with ectopic atrial tachycardia in the same patient
Ectopic Atrial Tachycardia with block
- Is characterized by a rapid and regular atrial rhythm at rates from 150 to 250 bpm
- Has abnormal P (or P’) waves whose morphology is different from that of the sinus P waves. P waves are often inverted in inferior leads (II, III, aVF) if the ectopic focus sits distally in the atria.
- Has isoelectric intervals between P waves in all leads.
- When atrial rates become fast, the AV Node usually blocks signals. EAT never occurs with First Degree AV Block. Always presents with Second Degree or Third Degree AV Blocks. Wenckebach conduction can also occur.
- P waves are often difficult to spot as they are often small and dysmorph, and often get buried in or superimposed on the QRS complex. Lead II is often difficult to use, while lead V1 is often a good lead for discerning P waves.
- Often occurs due to digitalis intoxication
Cherchez le P!
The above are the famous words by EKG master Henry J. L. Marriott, and is french for “Look for the P!”. What Marriott meant, was that finding and evaluating the P waves is the key to understanding and diagnosing arrhythmias. Marriott especially pointed out that one must look for P waves buried in T waves. In both premature contractions, like for instance a PAC, and in other conditions, P waves can get buried in both the preceding T wave, in the QRS and practically anywhere. And as we will see with this EKG, spotting P waves is what pinpoints the diagnosis.
The rhythm is obviously supraventricular, as QRS complexes are within the normal range (<120 ms). There are multiple, small P waves before many of the QRS complexes. The P:QRS ratio varies from 3:1 in the longest cycles to what seems like 1:1 in the shortest cycles. However, the latter is actually 2:1. When examining the QRS complexes, there are P waves buried in the QRS complex. The buried P waves appear at the end of the QRS, and are best seen in leads V2-V5, as they create a pseudo S wave at the end of each QRS. By marching out the P waves with a caliper, the buried P waves are easy to spot. With this in mind, and knowing that First Degree AV Block doesn’t occur with EAT, we will conclude that where AV block ratio seemed to be 1:1, the block is really 2:1. This means that in those cycles, there are actually two P waves for each QRS, but the second P wave is buried in the QRS itself. These are however, not sinus P waves. They are deflections from an ectopic atrial focus, and should therefore be referred to as P’ waves, which is the correct labelling for ectopic P waves.
By measuring the P’P’ interval, the atrial rate is constant and regular at 210 bpm. In the 2:1 block cycles, the ventricular rate is 105 bpm. The ventricular rate is half the atrial rate, which correlates with a 2:1 block. Now, remembering what Dr. Marriott preached, when examining the T waves, there are clearly P waves buried in their humps. This is best seen in lead V3, where T wave morphology changes throughout the lead. The extra peaks and bumps on the T waves are actually buried P’ waves. If these were not observed, this rhythm could be mistaken for an AV Nodal Reentry Tachycardia, as there would be no P waves preceding the QRS, with seemingly retrograd P waves shortly after ventricular depolarization. Also, you will note that:
- The baseline is perfectly isoelectric between each P’ wave, ruling out the macro reentry impulse rotation mechanism of atrial flutter.
- In inferior leads II, III and aVF, the P’ waves are inverted as the P wave axis is shifted superiorly. This indicates a low atrial focus and is a common sign of atrial ectopy. This again rules out atrial flutter, which would produce F-waves in the same leads.
- Unlike MAT (Multifocal Atrial Tachycardia), there are not multiple ectopic foci here. The P wave configuration is constant and unimorph throughout the leads.
February 3, 2009